Qd,8s,3h 翻后策略(Q高干面,单加注底池)
在 Qd,8s,3h(Q高干面)上,枪口位 UTG(有位置)面对 大盲位 BB(无位置)过牌时以 85.4% 的频率下注(c-bet),大盲位 BB 则以 100.0% 过牌。翻牌圈双方范围权益:大盲位 BB 44.3% vs 枪口位 UTG 55.7%(自有确定性引擎 seeded Monte Carlo,180,239 样本,95% CI ±0.23pp)。以下频率均为 TexasSolver 离线求解输出,可利用度 0.224%。
范围级动作频率
| 范围 / 动作 | 过牌 | 下注 18(约 33% 底池) | 下注 41(约 75% 底池) | 下注 975(约 1773% 底池) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 大盲位 BB · OOP | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 枪口位 UTG · IP (面对过牌) | 14.6% | 48.8% | 36.6% | 0.0% |
牌面解读
Q 高干面 UTG 仍握有 QQ+/AQ/KQ 的顶端,但相对 A/K 高面优势收窄。与 ackd7h 页对照,能看到同一范围在不同高张面上的频率梯度。
自有引擎交叉数据
| 范围 | 翻牌圈范围权益 | 理论组合数 | 该面组合数 | board 阻断损耗 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 大盲位 BB · OOP | 44.3% ±0.23pp | 184 | 165 | 19(10.3%) |
| 枪口位 UTG · IP | 55.7% ±0.23pp | 190 | 169 | 21(11.1%) |
方法: seeded Monte Carlo(180,239 样本, 95% CI ±0.23pp); 组合数为排除 board 阻断牌后的真实可持有组合。
按手牌类的求解频率
大盲位 BB(OOP)逐类频率
| 手牌类 | 组合 | 过牌 | 下注 18(约 33% 底池) | 下注 41(约 75% 底池) | 下注 975(约 1773% 底池) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 33 | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 44 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 55 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 66 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 77 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 88 | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 99 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 54s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 65s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 76s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 87s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 98s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A6s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A7s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A8s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A9s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AJo | 12 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AJs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AQo | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AQs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| ATo | 12 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| ATs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| JJ | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| JTs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KJs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KQo | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KQs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KTs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| QJs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| QTs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| T9s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| TT | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
枪口位 UTG(IP,面对过牌)逐类频率
| 手牌类 | 组合 | 过牌 | 下注 18(约 33% 底池) | 下注 41(约 75% 底池) | 下注 975(约 1773% 底池) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 6 | 7.9% | 45.1% | 47.0% | 0.0% |
| 33 | 3 | 0.0% | 20.5% | 79.5% | 0.0% |
| 44 | 6 | 19.6% | 35.4% | 45.0% | 0.0% |
| 55 | 6 | 28.2% | 51.0% | 20.9% | 0.0% |
| 66 | 6 | 38.5% | 53.0% | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| 77 | 6 | 33.4% | 63.4% | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| 88 | 3 | 0.0% | 48.3% | 51.7% | 0.0% |
| 99 | 6 | 19.7% | 67.4% | 12.8% | 0.0% |
| 87s | 3 | 6.7% | 45.9% | 47.4% | 0.0% |
| 98s | 3 | 17.9% | 55.8% | 26.2% | 0.0% |
| A4s | 4 | 12.0% | 28.7% | 59.3% | 0.0% |
| A5s | 4 | 15.0% | 46.0% | 39.1% | 0.0% |
| A9s | 4 | 10.7% | 44.3% | 44.9% | 0.0% |
| AA | 6 | 0.4% | 47.5% | 52.1% | 0.0% |
| AJo | 12 | 11.2% | 59.1% | 29.7% | 0.0% |
| AJs | 4 | 23.9% | 43.9% | 32.3% | 0.0% |
| AKo | 12 | 10.1% | 43.6% | 46.3% | 0.0% |
| AKs | 4 | 7.9% | 48.5% | 43.6% | 0.0% |
| AQo | 9 | 24.5% | 45.1% | 30.4% | 0.0% |
| AQs | 3 | 4.2% | 64.0% | 31.9% | 0.0% |
| ATs | 4 | 18.9% | 39.0% | 42.1% | 0.0% |
| JJ | 6 | 22.3% | 53.8% | 23.9% | 0.0% |
| JTs | 4 | 9.0% | 40.9% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| KJs | 4 | 10.3% | 29.4% | 60.2% | 0.0% |
| KK | 6 | 0.6% | 40.5% | 58.9% | 0.0% |
| KQo | 9 | 14.9% | 58.0% | 27.2% | 0.0% |
| KQs | 3 | 1.6% | 55.5% | 42.9% | 0.0% |
| KTs | 4 | 10.7% | 27.1% | 62.2% | 0.0% |
| QJs | 3 | 17.0% | 57.8% | 25.2% | 0.0% |
| 3 | 1.6% | 74.1% | 24.4% | 0.0% | |
| QTs | 3 | 20.2% | 58.7% | 21.2% | 0.0% |
| T9s | 4 | 5.4% | 49.8% | 44.8% | 0.0% |
| TT | 6 | 21.3% | 51.3% | 27.4% | 0.0% |
方法论
求解器: TexasSolver (console);400 次迭代,精度目标 0.2,可利用度 0.224%(越接近 0 越接近纳什均衡)。求解在本地离线完成,仅数据输出上线,AGPL 组件与生产代码隔离(不链接、不分发二进制)。范围权益由本站自有确定性引擎独立计算,与 solver 互为印证。
常见问题
枪口位 UTG 在 Qd,8s,3h 上 c-bet 频率是多少?
85.4%(TexasSolver 求解器输出,面对 大盲位 BB 过牌的节点);对应 大盲位 BB 在该节点过牌 100.0%。
这些数字是怎么算出来的?是 GTO 吗?
动作频率来自 TexasSolver 本地离线求解(400 次迭代,可利用度 0.224%,越接近 0 越接近均衡);范围权益 44.3%/55.7% 由本站自有确定性引擎独立交叉验证。求解为近似均衡,非唯一正解。
相关内容
教育用途;不构成投注建议。
引用本页: Pailiku, “Qd,8s,3h 翻后策略(Q高干面,单加注底池)”, pailiku.com/strategy/postflop/utg-vs-bb-srp-qd8s3h (2026).