Ac,Kd,7h 翻后策略(AK双高面,单加注底池)
在 Ac,Kd,7h(AK双高面)上,枪口位 UTG(有位置)面对 大盲位 BB(无位置)过牌时以 86.7% 的频率下注(c-bet),大盲位 BB 则以 100.0% 过牌。翻牌圈双方范围权益:大盲位 BB 45.5% vs 枪口位 UTG 54.5%(自有确定性引擎 seeded Monte Carlo,180,337 样本,95% CI ±0.23pp)。以下频率均为 TexasSolver 离线求解输出,可利用度 0.298%。
范围级动作频率
| 范围 / 动作 | 过牌 | 下注 18(约 33% 底池) | 下注 41(约 75% 底池) | 下注 975(约 1773% 底池) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 大盲位 BB · OOP | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 枪口位 UTG · IP (面对过牌) | 13.3% | 36.1% | 50.6% | 0.0% |
牌面解读
A-K 双高面对 UTG 的紧范围是极端优势面:BB 防守范围的绝大多数组合在此面上无从谈起。这也是全组中最接近"range bet"的场景。
自有引擎交叉数据
| 范围 | 翻牌圈范围权益 | 理论组合数 | 该面组合数 | board 阻断损耗 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 大盲位 BB · OOP | 45.5% ±0.23pp | 184 | 156 | 28(15.2%) |
| 枪口位 UTG · IP | 54.5% ±0.23pp | 190 | 155 | 35(18.4%) |
方法: seeded Monte Carlo(180,337 样本, 95% CI ±0.23pp); 组合数为排除 board 阻断牌后的真实可持有组合。
按手牌类的求解频率
大盲位 BB(OOP)逐类频率
| 手牌类 | 组合 | 过牌 | 下注 18(约 33% 底池) | 下注 41(约 75% 底池) | 下注 975(约 1773% 底池) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 33 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 44 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 55 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 66 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 77 | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 88 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 99 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 54s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 65s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 76s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 87s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 98s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A6s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A7s | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A8s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A9s | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AJo | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AJs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AQo | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AQs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| ATo | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| ATs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| JJ | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| JTs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KJs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KQo | 9 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KQs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KTs | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| QJs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| QTs | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| T9s | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| TT | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
枪口位 UTG(IP,面对过牌)逐类频率
| 手牌类 | 组合 | 过牌 | 下注 18(约 33% 底池) | 下注 41(约 75% 底池) | 下注 975(约 1773% 底池) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 6 | 8.2% | 31.5% | 60.4% | 0.0% |
| 33 | 6 | 8.7% | 27.9% | 63.4% | 0.0% |
| 44 | 6 | 12.8% | 40.6% | 46.7% | 0.0% |
| 55 | 6 | 14.0% | 53.7% | 32.4% | 0.0% |
| 66 | 6 | 13.5% | 39.3% | 47.2% | 0.0% |
| 77 | 3 | 0.0% | 1.7% | 98.3% | 0.0% |
| 88 | 6 | 15.0% | 13.8% | 71.1% | 0.0% |
| 99 | 6 | 25.8% | 18.3% | 55.9% | 0.0% |
| 87s | 3 | 0.0% | 1.3% | 98.7% | 0.0% |
| 98s | 4 | 15.9% | 33.6% | 50.5% | 0.0% |
| A4s | 3 | 15.6% | 47.0% | 37.4% | 0.0% |
| A5s | 3 | 13.8% | 44.4% | 41.8% | 0.0% |
| A9s | 3 | 18.6% | 46.1% | 35.3% | 0.0% |
| AA | 3 | 11.2% | 73.0% | 15.8% | 0.0% |
| AJo | 9 | 13.7% | 29.1% | 57.2% | 0.0% |
| AJs | 3 | 8.3% | 23.8% | 68.0% | 0.0% |
| AKo | 7 | 0.1% | 21.3% | 78.5% | 0.0% |
| AKs | 2 | 0.0% | 20.4% | 79.6% | 0.0% |
| AQo | 9 | 4.1% | 17.3% | 78.5% | 0.0% |
| AQs | 3 | 3.3% | 20.9% | 75.8% | 0.0% |
| ATs | 3 | 27.9% | 52.1% | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| JJ | 6 | 27.8% | 56.9% | 15.3% | 0.0% |
| JTs | 4 | 4.8% | 9.2% | 86.0% | 0.0% |
| KJs | 3 | 19.3% | 71.6% | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| KK | 3 | 1.4% | 52.5% | 46.1% | 0.0% |
| KQo | 9 | 14.9% | 56.1% | 29.1% | 0.0% |
| KQs | 3 | 20.0% | 49.3% | 30.7% | 0.0% |
| KTs | 3 | 16.0% | 67.8% | 16.2% | 0.0% |
| QJs | 4 | 3.6% | 26.2% | 70.2% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 20.1% | 72.3% | 7.6% | 0.0% | |
| QTs | 4 | 1.1% | 12.9% | 86.0% | 0.0% |
| T9s | 4 | 18.7% | 40.7% | 40.6% | 0.0% |
| TT | 6 | 41.4% | 34.9% | 23.7% | 0.0% |
方法论
求解器: TexasSolver (console);400 次迭代,精度目标 0.2,可利用度 0.298%(越接近 0 越接近纳什均衡)。求解在本地离线完成,仅数据输出上线,AGPL 组件与生产代码隔离(不链接、不分发二进制)。范围权益由本站自有确定性引擎独立计算,与 solver 互为印证。
常见问题
枪口位 UTG 在 Ac,Kd,7h 上 c-bet 频率是多少?
86.7%(TexasSolver 求解器输出,面对 大盲位 BB 过牌的节点);对应 大盲位 BB 在该节点过牌 100.0%。
这些数字是怎么算出来的?是 GTO 吗?
动作频率来自 TexasSolver 本地离线求解(400 次迭代,可利用度 0.298%,越接近 0 越接近均衡);范围权益 45.5%/54.5% 由本站自有确定性引擎独立交叉验证。求解为近似均衡,非唯一正解。
相关内容
教育用途;不构成投注建议。
引用本页: Pailiku, “Ac,Kd,7h 翻后策略(AK双高面,单加注底池)”, pailiku.com/strategy/postflop/utg-vs-bb-srp-ackd7h (2026).