8h,7h,6s postflop strategy (中连两色湿面, single-raised pot)
On 8h,7h,6s (中连两色湿面), Button (in position) c-bets 53.4% of the time when Big Blind (out of position) checks, while Big Blind checks 58.3%. Flop range equity: Big Blind 51.2% vs Button 48.8% (our deterministic seeded Monte Carlo, 180,832 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp). All frequencies below are TexasSolver offline outputs; exploitability 0.306%.
Range-level action frequencies
| Range / action | Check | Bet 18 (~33% pot) | Bet 41 (~75% pot) | Bet 975 (~1773% pot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Blind · OOP | 58.3% | 28.5% | 13.2% | 0.0% |
| Button · IP (vs check) | 46.6% | 46.6% | 6.7% | 0.0% |
Board reading
8-7-6 two-tone is the classic board where the defender is far from behind: BB's medium connectors make straights and strong draws in bulk. The in-position player's betting frequency contracts sharply here — the gap versus the K-high page is the most instructive comparison in this set.
Cross-check from our own engine
| Range | Flop range equity | Theoretical combos | On-board combos | Board-blocker loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Blind · OOP | 51.2% ±0.23pp | 318 | 283 | 35（11.0%） |
| Button · IP | 48.8% ±0.23pp | 582 | 530 | 52（8.9%） |
Method: seeded Monte Carlo (180,832 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp); combo counts are live holdings after removing board blockers.
Solver frequency by hand class
Big Blind (OOP) frequency by class
| Hand class | Combos | Check | Bet 18 (~33% pot) | Bet 41 (~75% pot) | Bet 975 (~1773% pot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 6 | 79.6% | 15.3% | 5.2% | 0.0% |
| 33 | 6 | 82.8% | 14.2% | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| 44 | 6 | 70.5% | 25.6% | 4.0% | 0.0% |
| 55 | 6 | 68.2% | 24.0% | 7.8% | 0.0% |
| 66 | 3 | 41.8% | 34.1% | 24.1% | 0.0% |
| 77 | 3 | 44.8% | 35.8% | 19.4% | 0.0% |
| 88 | 3 | 44.2% | 38.0% | 17.8% | 0.0% |
| 43s | 4 | 80.8% | 14.9% | 4.3% | 0.0% |
| 53s | 4 | 34.1% | 40.6% | 25.4% | 0.0% |
| 54s | 4 | 46.8% | 34.1% | 19.1% | 0.0% |
| 64s | 3 | 54.2% | 37.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| 75s | 3 | 48.6% | 35.1% | 16.2% | 0.0% |
| 86s | 2 | 64.2% | 28.3% | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| 87s | 3 | 51.7% | 31.1% | 17.2% | 0.0% |
| 97s | 3 | 64.9% | 30.0% | 5.1% | 0.0% |
| 98o | 9 | 56.9% | 34.9% | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| 98s | 3 | 45.3% | 39.0% | 15.7% | 0.0% |
| A6s | 3 | 79.7% | 16.4% | 3.9% | 0.0% |
| A7o | 9 | 53.0% | 41.4% | 5.6% | 0.0% |
| A7s | 3 | 54.8% | 38.8% | 6.4% | 0.0% |
| A8o | 9 | 43.3% | 42.7% | 14.0% | 0.0% |
| A8s | 3 | 45.6% | 41.4% | 13.0% | 0.0% |
| A9o | 12 | 61.7% | 25.8% | 12.6% | 0.0% |
| A9s | 4 | 62.3% | 28.1% | 9.7% | 0.0% |
| AJo | 12 | 78.0% | 13.2% | 8.8% | 0.0% |
| ATo | 12 | 69.6% | 22.6% | 7.9% | 0.0% |
| ATs | 4 | 59.9% | 30.2% | 9.9% | 0.0% |
| J8s | 3 | 67.2% | 26.3% | 6.5% | 0.0% |
| J9s | 4 | 43.1% | 34.0% | 22.9% | 0.0% |
| JTo | 12 | 39.3% | 33.2% | 27.5% | 0.0% |
| JTs | 4 | 43.7% | 28.9% | 27.4% | 0.0% |
| K6s | 3 | 73.3% | 22.4% | 4.3% | 0.0% |
| K7s | 3 | 64.6% | 32.9% | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| K8s | 3 | 63.0% | 28.5% | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| K9s | 4 | 36.6% | 41.0% | 22.4% | 0.0% |
| KJo | 12 | 71.1% | 17.6% | 11.3% | 0.0% |
| KJs | 4 | 66.6% | 21.3% | 12.1% | 0.0% |
| KQo | 12 | 81.2% | 14.0% | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| KTo | 12 | 51.3% | 32.3% | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| KTs | 4 | 49.9% | 29.1% | 21.0% | 0.0% |
| Q8s | 3 | 68.3% | 28.7% | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| Q9s | 4 | 41.5% | 35.9% | 22.6% | 0.0% |
| QJo | 12 | 73.5% | 15.4% | 11.1% | 0.0% |
| QJs | 4 | 63.2% | 21.1% | 15.7% | 0.0% |
| QTo | 12 | 41.7% | 35.4% | 22.9% | 0.0% |
| QTs | 4 | 45.4% | 29.9% | 24.7% | 0.0% |
| T7s | 3 | 64.2% | 33.9% | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| T8s | 3 | 43.8% | 43.8% | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| T9o | 12 | 38.4% | 38.8% | 22.8% | 0.0% |
| T9s | 4 | 40.2% | 35.3% | 24.5% | 0.0% |
Button (IP, vs check) frequency by class
| Hand class | Combos | Check | Bet 18 (~33% pot) | Bet 41 (~75% pot) | Bet 975 (~1773% pot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 6 | 53.1% | 30.7% | 16.2% | 0.0% |
| 33 | 6 | 90.5% | 8.4% | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| 44 | 6 | 79.2% | 20.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 55 | 6 | 78.4% | 21.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 66 | 3 | 10.8% | 77.7% | 11.5% | 0.0% |
| 77 | 3 | 14.8% | 73.2% | 12.0% | 0.0% |
| 88 | 3 | 21.8% | 70.5% | 7.7% | 0.0% |
| 99 | 6 | 3.9% | 85.5% | 10.6% | 0.0% |
| 43s | 4 | 50.6% | 42.2% | 7.2% | 0.0% |
| 53s | 4 | 29.1% | 46.9% | 24.1% | 0.0% |
| 54s | 4 | 16.9% | 73.6% | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| 64s | 3 | 44.3% | 50.1% | 5.6% | 0.0% |
| 65s | 3 | 45.6% | 52.5% | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| 74s | 3 | 57.0% | 42.4% | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| 75s | 3 | 48.6% | 45.6% | 5.8% | 0.0% |
| 76s | 2 | 24.0% | 69.8% | 6.2% | 0.0% |
| 85s | 3 | 50.8% | 47.9% | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| 86s | 2 | 58.5% | 41.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| 87s | 3 | 40.5% | 53.9% | 5.6% | 0.0% |
| 96s | 3 | 58.5% | 37.8% | 3.7% | 0.0% |
| 97s | 3 | 59.3% | 39.4% | 1.3% | 0.0% |
| 98o | 9 | 53.1% | 44.0% | 2.9% | 0.0% |
| 98s | 3 | 36.7% | 57.6% | 5.7% | 0.0% |
| A2o | 12 | 36.5% | 43.6% | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| A2s | 4 | 83.6% | 15.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| A3o | 12 | 57.3% | 31.7% | 11.0% | 0.0% |
| A3s | 4 | 82.5% | 15.4% | 2.2% | 0.0% |
| A4o | 12 | 45.0% | 54.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| A4s | 4 | 60.6% | 37.5% | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| A5o | 12 | 35.3% | 55.2% | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| A5s | 4 | 27.5% | 65.7% | 6.8% | 0.0% |
| A6o | 9 | 40.7% | 57.3% | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| A6s | 3 | 30.0% | 64.5% | 5.5% | 0.0% |
| A7o | 9 | 46.2% | 52.3% | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| A7s | 3 | 34.0% | 65.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% |
| A8o | 9 | 23.7% | 68.9% | 7.4% | 0.0% |
| A8s | 3 | 12.4% | 74.5% | 13.1% | 0.0% |
| A9o | 12 | 61.5% | 35.3% | 3.2% | 0.0% |
| A9s | 4 | 43.9% | 51.3% | 4.8% | 0.0% |
| AA | 6 | 88.3% | 11.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AJo | 12 | 50.8% | 40.3% | 8.9% | 0.0% |
| AJs | 4 | 80.0% | 17.0% | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| AKo | 12 | 50.6% | 49.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| AKs | 4 | 69.8% | 29.9% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| AQo | 12 | 44.3% | 55.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AQs | 4 | 60.2% | 38.2% | 1.7% | 0.0% |
| ATo | 12 | 44.7% | 50.6% | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| ATs | 4 | 34.2% | 61.8% | 4.0% | 0.0% |
| J6s | 3 | 87.5% | 10.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| J7s | 3 | 93.2% | 6.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| J8s | 3 | 85.4% | 13.5% | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| J9o | 12 | 26.2% | 60.9% | 12.9% | 0.0% |
| J9s | 4 | 12.7% | 74.8% | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| JJ | 6 | 29.5% | 63.3% | 7.2% | 0.0% |
| JTo | 12 | 39.1% | 55.0% | 5.9% | 0.0% |
| JTs | 4 | 30.6% | 61.9% | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| K2s | 4 | 47.3% | 32.4% | 20.3% | 0.0% |
| K3s | 4 | 60.6% | 30.8% | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| K4s | 4 | 70.2% | 25.8% | 3.9% | 0.0% |
| K5s | 4 | 4.7% | 74.1% | 21.2% | 0.0% |
| K6s | 3 | 75.7% | 22.5% | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| K7s | 3 | 76.8% | 21.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| K8o | 9 | 46.6% | 50.2% | 3.3% | 0.0% |
| K8s | 3 | 30.4% | 64.3% | 5.3% | 0.0% |
| K9o | 12 | 39.4% | 49.0% | 11.5% | 0.0% |
| K9s | 4 | 41.9% | 44.6% | 13.5% | 0.0% |
| KJo | 12 | 38.3% | 57.2% | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| KJs | 4 | 75.5% | 22.1% | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| KK | 6 | 68.1% | 31.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KQo | 12 | 82.4% | 17.4% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| KQs | 4 | 89.7% | 10.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| KTo | 12 | 42.4% | 48.2% | 9.4% | 0.0% |
| KTs | 4 | 57.4% | 38.4% | 4.2% | 0.0% |
| Q4s | 4 | 56.6% | 37.7% | 5.6% | 0.0% |
| Q5s | 4 | 8.1% | 81.0% | 10.9% | 0.0% |
| Q6s | 3 | 74.6% | 19.3% | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Q7s | 3 | 78.4% | 19.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Q8s | 3 | 42.6% | 52.9% | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| Q9o | 12 | 29.4% | 60.8% | 9.8% | 0.0% |
| Q9s | 4 | 25.4% | 66.0% | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| QJo | 12 | 45.6% | 42.0% | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| QJs | 4 | 54.3% | 39.8% | 5.8% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 55.7% | 43.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | |
| QTo | 12 | 42.4% | 45.0% | 12.6% | 0.0% |
| QTs | 4 | 60.5% | 34.1% | 5.4% | 0.0% |
| T6s | 3 | 75.1% | 23.5% | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| T7s | 3 | 67.6% | 31.3% | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| T8s | 3 | 18.8% | 71.1% | 10.1% | 0.0% |
| T9o | 12 | 12.4% | 70.4% | 17.2% | 0.0% |
| T9s | 4 | 7.6% | 69.2% | 23.3% | 0.0% |
| TT | 6 | 2.5% | 82.7% | 14.8% | 0.0% |
Methodology
Solver: TexasSolver (console); 400 iterations, accuracy target 0.2, exploitability 0.306% (closer to 0 is closer to Nash equilibrium). Solving is done locally and offline — only data outputs ship, and the AGPL component is isolated from production code (not linked, no binary distribution). Range equity is computed independently by our own deterministic engine as a cross-check.
FAQ
What is Button's c-bet frequency on 8h,7h,6s?
53.4% (TexasSolver output at the node where Big Blind checks); correspondingly Big Blind checks 58.3% there.
How are these numbers computed? Are they GTO?
Action frequencies come from a local offline TexasSolver run (400 iterations, exploitability 0.306% — closer to 0 is closer to equilibrium); the range equities 51.2%/48.8% are independently cross-checked by our own deterministic engine. A solve is an approximate equilibrium, not a unique answer.
Related
Educational use; not betting advice.
Cite this page: Pailiku, “8h,7h,6s postflop strategy (中连两色湿面, single-raised pot)”, pailiku.com/strategy/postflop/btn-vs-bb-srp-8h7h6s (2026).