← Back to postflop spots

Qs,Th,6h postflop strategy (Q高两色听牌面, single-raised pot)

On Qs,Th,6h (Q高两色听牌面), Button (in position) c-bets 44.6% of the time when Big Blind (out of position) checks, while Big Blind checks 100.0%. Flop range equity: Big Blind 51.1% vs Button 48.9% (our deterministic seeded Monte Carlo, 180,927 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp). All frequencies below are TexasSolver offline outputs; exploitability 0.230%.

Range-level action frequencies

Range-level frequency per action (pot 55; bet sizes annotated as % of pot)
Range / actionCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
Big Blind · OOP100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Button · IP (vs check)55.4%0.0%44.6%0.0%

Board reading

Q-T-6 two-tone connects with both ranges: BB holds many QTs/JTs/T9s type hands, cutting into BTN's range edge. Watch how checking frequency rises versus the K-high board and how larger sizings appear.

Cross-check from our own engine

Range-vs-range equity and combo coverage (equity computed independently of the solver)
RangeFlop range equityTheoretical combosOn-board combosBoard-blocker loss
Big Blind · OOP51.1% ±0.23pp31827741（12.9%）
Button · IP48.9% ±0.23pp58251468（11.7%）

Method: seeded Monte Carlo (180,927 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp); combo counts are live holdings after removing board blockers.

Solver frequency by hand class

Big Blind (OOP) frequency by class
Big Blind (OOP) action frequency per hand class
Hand classCombosCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
226100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
336100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
446100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
556100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
66399.8%0.2%0.0%0.0%
776100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
886100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
43s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
53s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
54s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
64s399.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
75s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
86s399.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
87s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
97s499.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
98o1299.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
98s499.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
A6s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
A7o12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
A7s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
A8o12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
A8s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
A9o12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
A9s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
AJo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ATo9100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ATs3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
J8s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
J9s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
JTo9100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
JTs399.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
K6s399.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
K7s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
K8s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
K9s499.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
KJo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KJs499.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
KQo9100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KTo999.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
KTs3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Q8s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Q9s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
QJo9100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
QJs399.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
QTo799.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
QTs299.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
T7s399.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
T8s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
T9o9100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
T9s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Button (IP, vs check) frequency by class
Button (IP) action frequency per hand class
Hand classCombosCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
22653.9%0.0%46.1%0.0%
33664.8%0.0%35.2%0.0%
44684.3%0.0%15.7%0.0%
55695.9%0.0%4.2%0.0%
6630.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%
776100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
886100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
99698.6%0.0%1.4%0.0%
43s462.0%0.0%38.0%0.0%
53s455.5%0.0%44.5%0.0%
54s450.9%0.0%49.1%0.0%
64s328.8%0.0%71.2%0.0%
65s310.6%0.0%89.4%0.0%
74s476.0%0.0%24.0%0.0%
75s481.0%0.0%19.0%0.0%
76s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
85s483.8%0.0%16.2%0.0%
86s387.2%0.0%12.8%0.0%
87s468.5%0.0%31.5%0.0%
96s321.2%0.0%78.8%0.0%
97s421.9%0.0%78.1%0.0%
98o1230.5%0.0%69.5%0.0%
98s416.6%0.0%83.5%0.0%
A2o1248.9%0.0%51.1%0.0%
A2s444.6%0.0%55.4%0.0%
A3o1258.6%0.0%41.4%0.0%
A3s477.6%0.0%22.4%0.0%
A4o1261.3%0.0%38.7%0.0%
A4s472.4%0.0%27.6%0.0%
A5o1279.3%0.0%20.7%0.0%
A5s479.5%0.0%20.5%0.0%
A6o971.6%0.0%28.4%0.0%
A6s354.8%0.0%45.2%0.0%
A7o1276.4%0.0%23.6%0.0%
A7s478.2%0.0%21.8%0.0%
A8o1257.2%0.0%42.8%0.0%
A8s475.5%0.0%24.5%0.0%
A9o1272.5%0.0%27.5%0.0%
A9s488.2%0.0%11.8%0.0%
AA64.9%0.0%95.1%0.0%
AJo1257.8%0.0%42.2%0.0%
AJs438.1%0.0%61.9%0.0%
AKo1252.2%0.0%47.8%0.0%
AKs420.7%0.0%79.3%0.0%
AQo917.1%0.0%82.9%0.0%
AQs310.4%0.0%89.6%0.0%
ATo974.9%0.0%25.1%0.0%
ATs357.9%0.0%42.1%0.0%
J6s359.1%0.0%40.9%0.0%
J7s486.1%0.0%13.9%0.0%
J8s442.3%0.0%57.7%0.0%
J9o1230.7%0.0%69.3%0.0%
J9s47.4%0.0%92.6%0.0%
JJ674.5%0.0%25.5%0.0%
JTo999.4%0.0%0.6%0.0%
JTs398.5%0.0%1.5%0.0%
K2s445.6%0.0%54.4%0.0%
K3s461.2%0.0%38.8%0.0%
K4s459.8%0.0%40.2%0.0%
K5s471.5%0.0%28.5%0.0%
K6s370.3%0.0%29.7%0.0%
K7s467.9%0.0%32.1%0.0%
K8o1246.9%0.0%53.1%0.0%
K8s421.4%0.0%78.6%0.0%
K9o1222.5%0.0%77.5%0.0%
K9s49.0%0.0%91.0%0.0%
KJo1240.3%0.0%59.7%0.0%
KJs417.8%0.0%82.2%0.0%
KK60.1%0.0%99.9%0.0%
KQo925.0%0.0%75.0%0.0%
KQs316.1%0.0%83.9%0.0%
KTo986.7%0.0%13.3%0.0%
KTs359.0%0.0%41.0%0.0%
Q4s362.4%0.0%37.6%0.0%
Q5s347.9%0.0%52.1%0.0%
Q6s249.1%0.0%50.9%0.0%
Q7s373.3%0.0%26.7%0.0%
Q8s376.3%0.0%23.7%0.0%
Q9o967.1%0.0%32.9%0.0%
Q9s356.6%0.0%43.4%0.0%
QJo946.1%0.0%53.9%0.0%
QJs330.7%0.0%69.3%0.0%
QQ30.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%
QTo75.5%0.0%94.5%0.0%
QTs21.4%0.0%98.6%0.0%
T6s33.9%0.0%96.1%0.0%
T7s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
T8s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
T9o986.9%0.0%13.1%0.0%
T9s394.1%0.0%5.9%0.0%
TT30.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%

Methodology

Solver: TexasSolver (console); 400 iterations, accuracy target 0.2, exploitability 0.230% (closer to 0 is closer to Nash equilibrium). Solving is done locally and offline — only data outputs ship, and the AGPL component is isolated from production code (not linked, no binary distribution). Range equity is computed independently by our own deterministic engine as a cross-check.

Sitewide methodology →

FAQ

What is Button's c-bet frequency on Qs,Th,6h?

44.6% (TexasSolver output at the node where Big Blind checks); correspondingly Big Blind checks 100.0% there.

How are these numbers computed? Are they GTO?

Action frequencies come from a local offline TexasSolver run (400 iterations, exploitability 0.230% — closer to 0 is closer to equilibrium); the range equities 51.1%/48.9% are independently cross-checked by our own deterministic engine. A solve is an approximate equilibrium, not a unique answer.

Educational use; not betting advice.

Cite this page: Pailiku, “Qs,Th,6h postflop strategy (Q高两色听牌面, single-raised pot)”, pailiku.com/strategy/postflop/btn-vs-bb-srp-qsth6h (2026).