← Back to postflop spots

Ah,8s,3c postflop strategy (A高干面, single-raised pot)

On Ah,8s,3c (A高干面), Button (in position) c-bets 54.0% of the time when Big Blind (out of position) checks, while Big Blind checks 98.2%. Flop range equity: Big Blind 47.3% vs Button 52.7% (our deterministic seeded Monte Carlo, 180,844 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp). All frequencies below are TexasSolver offline outputs; exploitability 0.357%.

Range-level action frequencies

Range-level frequency per action (pot 55; bet sizes annotated as % of pot)
Range / actionCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
Big Blind · OOP98.2%0.5%1.3%0.0%
Button · IP (vs check)46.0%50.2%3.9%0.0%

Board reading

An A-high dry board also favors the raiser, but unlike K-high boards BB keeps plenty of suited Ax in the defending range, so top-pair distribution is less lopsided. Comparing the two pages shows how c-bet frequency tracks the defender's range structure.

Cross-check from our own engine

Range-vs-range equity and combo coverage (equity computed independently of the solver)
RangeFlop range equityTheoretical combosOn-board combosBoard-blocker loss
Big Blind · OOP47.3% ±0.23pp31827741（12.9%）
Button · IP52.7% ±0.23pp58250280（13.7%）

Method: seeded Monte Carlo (180,844 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp); combo counts are live holdings after removing board blockers.

Solver frequency by hand class

Big Blind (OOP) frequency by class
Big Blind (OOP) action frequency per hand class
Hand classCombosCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
22699.5%0.4%0.1%0.0%
33391.2%1.0%7.9%0.0%
44699.6%0.4%0.0%0.0%
55699.6%0.3%0.1%0.0%
66699.5%0.5%0.0%0.0%
77699.8%0.2%0.0%0.0%
88393.8%1.5%4.6%0.0%
43s395.0%0.6%4.4%0.0%
53s395.2%0.7%4.1%0.0%
54s493.2%1.0%5.8%0.0%
64s496.1%0.7%3.3%0.0%
75s493.0%1.0%6.0%0.0%
86s398.3%0.4%1.3%0.0%
87s396.9%0.9%2.2%0.0%
97s492.7%1.3%6.0%0.0%
98o999.3%0.7%0.0%0.0%
98s397.5%1.2%1.3%0.0%
A6s399.8%0.2%0.0%0.0%
A7o999.9%0.1%0.0%0.0%
A7s399.4%0.6%0.0%0.0%
A8o793.8%1.2%5.0%0.0%
A8s293.9%1.6%4.5%0.0%
A9o999.1%0.5%0.5%0.0%
A9s396.1%1.8%2.1%0.0%
AJo997.1%0.9%2.0%0.0%
ATo998.8%0.4%0.9%0.0%
ATs396.7%1.6%1.8%0.0%
J8s399.0%0.7%0.3%0.0%
J9s496.6%1.1%2.3%0.0%
JTo1299.5%0.4%0.1%0.0%
JTs489.8%0.6%9.6%0.0%
K6s498.9%1.0%0.1%0.0%
K7s499.5%0.5%0.0%0.0%
K8s398.6%0.8%0.6%0.0%
K9s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KJo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KJs4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KQo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KTo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KTs4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Q8s399.1%0.7%0.2%0.0%
Q9s4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
QJo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
QJs496.9%0.7%2.4%0.0%
QTo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
QTs496.1%1.1%2.8%0.0%
T7s499.1%0.6%0.4%0.0%
T8s399.0%0.8%0.3%0.0%
T9o12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
T9s489.4%2.2%8.4%0.0%
Button (IP, vs check) frequency by class
Button (IP) action frequency per hand class
Hand classCombosCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
22657.1%42.9%0.0%0.0%
3330.0%71.2%28.8%0.0%
44661.6%38.4%0.0%0.0%
55648.1%51.7%0.1%0.0%
66660.3%39.7%0.0%0.0%
77661.2%38.9%0.0%0.0%
8830.0%85.2%14.8%0.0%
99637.8%56.4%5.8%0.0%
43s34.0%81.5%14.5%0.0%
53s36.2%81.5%12.2%0.0%
54s40.2%87.1%12.6%0.0%
64s432.4%56.1%11.5%0.0%
65s438.8%46.1%15.1%0.0%
74s424.6%69.4%6.0%0.0%
75s441.0%47.9%11.1%0.0%
76s426.4%62.4%11.2%0.0%
85s30.1%90.1%9.8%0.0%
86s33.3%92.8%4.0%0.0%
87s328.6%70.3%1.1%0.0%
96s446.3%50.3%3.4%0.0%
97s435.7%57.7%6.7%0.0%
98o961.2%38.8%0.0%0.0%
98s317.7%81.8%0.5%0.0%
A2o969.0%30.9%0.0%0.0%
A2s334.3%65.7%0.0%0.0%
A3o723.3%70.0%6.7%0.0%
A3s212.8%81.9%5.2%0.0%
A4o940.0%59.7%0.3%0.0%
A4s319.6%80.4%0.0%0.0%
A5o949.6%50.2%0.2%0.0%
A5s334.5%65.5%0.0%0.0%
A6o994.4%5.6%0.0%0.0%
A6s352.3%47.7%0.0%0.0%
A7o976.7%23.3%0.0%0.0%
A7s350.5%49.5%0.0%0.0%
A8o710.3%83.2%6.5%0.0%
A8s26.7%90.8%2.5%0.0%
A9o949.6%49.3%1.1%0.0%
A9s310.9%86.1%3.0%0.0%
AA30.0%95.8%4.2%0.0%
AJo948.8%47.6%3.6%0.0%
AJs314.9%78.7%6.4%0.0%
AKo923.9%67.0%9.1%0.0%
AKs33.5%75.9%20.6%0.0%
AQo928.3%61.8%9.9%0.0%
AQs36.3%83.3%10.4%0.0%
ATo947.8%50.4%1.7%0.0%
ATs315.3%80.5%4.3%0.0%
J6s450.7%47.6%1.7%0.0%
J7s410.9%84.0%5.1%0.0%
J8s331.0%66.1%2.9%0.0%
J9o1216.1%80.2%3.8%0.0%
J9s445.6%36.1%18.3%0.0%
JJ672.8%26.9%0.3%0.0%
JTo1246.9%46.2%6.9%0.0%
JTs48.2%84.3%7.5%0.0%
K2s456.2%43.7%0.1%0.0%
K3s351.4%46.9%1.7%0.0%
K4s435.8%59.9%4.3%0.0%
K5s426.9%71.1%2.0%0.0%
K6s460.6%39.4%0.0%0.0%
K7s449.5%50.5%0.0%0.0%
K8o923.5%72.3%4.2%0.0%
K8s31.1%96.0%2.9%0.0%
K9o1253.5%46.5%0.0%0.0%
K9s487.7%12.3%0.0%0.0%
KJo1299.2%0.8%0.0%0.0%
KJs4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KK694.2%5.8%0.0%0.0%
KQo12100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KQs4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
KTo1288.3%11.7%0.0%0.0%
KTs4100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Q4s425.6%59.6%14.9%0.0%
Q5s427.1%60.0%12.9%0.0%
Q6s469.5%30.5%0.0%0.0%
Q7s460.7%39.3%0.0%0.0%
Q8s313.7%79.7%6.5%0.0%
Q9o1229.0%68.4%2.6%0.0%
Q9s436.2%46.9%16.9%0.0%
QJo1238.6%58.4%3.0%0.0%
QJs447.8%48.0%4.2%0.0%
QQ685.4%14.6%0.0%0.0%
QTo1236.3%61.1%2.6%0.0%
QTs444.6%48.1%7.3%0.0%
T6s413.4%78.5%8.1%0.0%
T7s457.0%39.9%3.1%0.0%
T8s348.2%51.3%0.5%0.0%
T9o1248.3%45.9%5.9%0.0%
T9s40.0%96.0%4.0%0.0%
TT661.2%35.8%3.0%0.0%

Methodology

Solver: TexasSolver (console); 400 iterations, accuracy target 0.2, exploitability 0.357% (closer to 0 is closer to Nash equilibrium). Solving is done locally and offline — only data outputs ship, and the AGPL component is isolated from production code (not linked, no binary distribution). Range equity is computed independently by our own deterministic engine as a cross-check.

Sitewide methodology →

FAQ

What is Button's c-bet frequency on Ah,8s,3c?

54.0% (TexasSolver output at the node where Big Blind checks); correspondingly Big Blind checks 98.2% there.

How are these numbers computed? Are they GTO?

Action frequencies come from a local offline TexasSolver run (400 iterations, exploitability 0.357% — closer to 0 is closer to equilibrium); the range equities 47.3%/52.7% are independently cross-checked by our own deterministic engine. A solve is an approximate equilibrium, not a unique answer.

Educational use; not betting advice.

Cite this page: Pailiku, “Ah,8s,3c postflop strategy (A高干面, single-raised pot)”, pailiku.com/strategy/postflop/btn-vs-bb-srp-ah8s3c (2026).