← Back to postflop spots

Ts,9s,4h postflop strategy (T高两色动态面, single-raised pot)

On Ts,9s,4h (T高两色动态面), Button (in position) c-bets 41.2% of the time when Big Blind (out of position) checks, while Big Blind checks 85.1%. Flop range equity: Big Blind 52.9% vs Button 47.1% (our deterministic seeded Monte Carlo, 180,862 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp). All frequencies below are TexasSolver offline outputs; exploitability 0.406%.

Range-level action frequencies

Range-level frequency per action (pot 55; bet sizes annotated as % of pot)
Range / actionCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
Big Blind · OOP85.1%14.8%0.1%0.0%
Button · IP (vs check)58.8%0.0%41.2%0.0%

Board reading

T-9-4 two-tone is draw-dense: both sides hold many direct and backdoor draws, with equity close but realizability favoring the in-position button. Watch the raise frequencies — the defender's check-raise space is far larger than on dry boards.

Cross-check from our own engine

Range-vs-range equity and combo coverage (equity computed independently of the solver)
RangeFlop range equityTheoretical combosOn-board combosBoard-blocker loss
Big Blind · OOP52.9% ±0.23pp31827543（13.5%）
Button · IP47.1% ±0.23pp58251567（11.5%）

Method: seeded Monte Carlo (180,862 samples, 95% CI ±0.23pp); combo counts are live holdings after removing board blockers.

Solver frequency by hand class

Big Blind (OOP) frequency by class
Big Blind (OOP) action frequency per hand class
Hand classCombosCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
22694.4%5.6%0.0%0.0%
33696.2%3.8%0.0%0.0%
44367.0%32.4%0.6%0.0%
55692.4%7.6%0.0%0.0%
66696.2%3.8%0.0%0.0%
77695.5%4.4%0.0%0.0%
88692.2%7.8%0.0%0.0%
43s365.6%34.0%0.4%0.0%
53s493.3%6.7%0.0%0.0%
54s383.6%16.3%0.0%0.0%
64s383.4%16.6%0.0%0.0%
75s495.6%4.4%0.0%0.0%
86s463.1%36.6%0.3%0.0%
87s476.7%23.2%0.2%0.0%
97s385.5%14.5%0.0%0.0%
98o984.8%15.2%0.1%0.0%
98s378.2%21.7%0.1%0.0%
A6s494.4%5.5%0.1%0.0%
A7o1294.3%5.7%0.0%0.0%
A7s488.6%11.3%0.1%0.0%
A8o1296.3%3.7%0.0%0.0%
A8s491.1%8.8%0.1%0.0%
A9o986.4%13.6%0.0%0.0%
A9s387.9%12.0%0.0%0.0%
AJo1289.7%10.3%0.0%0.0%
ATo982.8%17.1%0.1%0.0%
ATs385.4%14.5%0.1%0.0%
J8s477.8%22.0%0.2%0.0%
J9s392.8%7.2%0.0%0.0%
JTo986.3%13.7%0.0%0.0%
JTs377.4%22.5%0.1%0.0%
K6s494.5%5.4%0.0%0.0%
K7s492.6%7.3%0.0%0.0%
K8s496.5%3.5%0.0%0.0%
K9s390.7%9.3%0.0%0.0%
KJo1273.2%26.5%0.3%0.0%
KJs479.6%20.3%0.1%0.0%
KQo1274.5%25.1%0.3%0.0%
KTo984.2%15.8%0.1%0.0%
KTs376.6%23.3%0.1%0.0%
Q8s480.4%19.4%0.1%0.0%
Q9s390.0%9.9%0.0%0.0%
QJo1280.1%19.8%0.1%0.0%
QJs474.6%25.2%0.2%0.0%
QTo984.7%15.2%0.1%0.0%
QTs376.6%23.3%0.1%0.0%
T7s383.0%17.0%0.0%0.0%
T8s378.5%21.5%0.0%0.0%
T9o669.4%30.4%0.2%0.0%
T9s371.5%28.2%0.3%0.0%
Button (IP, vs check) frequency by class
Button (IP) action frequency per hand class
Hand classCombosCheckBet 18 (~33% pot)Bet 41 (~75% pot)Bet 975 (~1773% pot)
22667.2%0.0%32.8%0.0%
33679.6%0.0%20.4%0.0%
4430.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%
55697.2%0.0%2.8%0.0%
666100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
776100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
886100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
9933.4%0.1%96.5%0.0%
43s316.5%0.0%83.5%0.0%
53s459.9%0.0%40.1%0.0%
54s340.2%0.0%59.8%0.0%
64s338.7%0.0%61.3%0.0%
65s448.6%0.0%51.3%0.0%
74s377.7%0.0%22.3%0.0%
75s488.8%0.0%11.2%0.0%
76s471.5%0.0%28.4%0.0%
85s489.5%0.0%10.5%0.0%
86s438.5%0.0%61.5%0.0%
87s421.5%0.0%78.5%0.0%
96s399.5%0.0%0.5%0.0%
97s3100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
98o979.5%0.0%20.5%0.0%
98s390.6%0.0%9.4%0.0%
A2o1258.5%0.0%41.5%0.0%
A2s441.9%0.0%58.1%0.0%
A3o1259.9%0.0%40.1%0.0%
A3s460.1%0.0%39.9%0.0%
A4o946.9%0.0%53.1%0.0%
A4s364.7%0.0%35.3%0.0%
A5o1260.5%0.0%39.5%0.0%
A5s467.5%0.0%32.5%0.0%
A6o1273.2%0.0%26.8%0.0%
A6s478.2%0.0%21.8%0.0%
A7o1261.7%0.0%38.3%0.0%
A7s478.1%0.0%21.9%0.0%
A8o1263.4%0.0%36.6%0.0%
A8s476.0%0.0%24.0%0.0%
A9o962.8%0.0%37.2%0.0%
A9s359.3%0.0%40.7%0.0%
AA630.6%0.0%69.4%0.0%
AJo1242.2%0.0%57.8%0.0%
AJs483.1%0.0%16.9%0.0%
AKo1289.3%0.0%10.7%0.0%
AKs497.0%0.0%3.0%0.0%
AQo1270.2%0.0%29.8%0.0%
AQs478.9%0.0%21.1%0.0%
ATo919.7%0.0%80.3%0.0%
ATs312.4%0.0%87.6%0.0%
J6s468.7%0.0%31.3%0.0%
J7s420.2%0.0%79.8%0.0%
J8s429.4%0.0%70.6%0.0%
J9o995.1%0.0%4.9%0.0%
J9s383.5%0.0%16.5%0.0%
JJ60.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%
JTo993.4%0.0%6.6%0.0%
JTs379.3%0.0%20.7%0.0%
K2s477.7%0.0%22.3%0.0%
K3s480.7%0.0%19.3%0.0%
K4s337.0%0.0%63.0%0.0%
K5s473.3%0.0%26.7%0.0%
K6s473.1%0.0%26.9%0.0%
K7s445.5%0.0%54.5%0.0%
K8o1248.3%0.0%51.7%0.0%
K8s426.5%0.0%73.5%0.0%
K9o984.0%0.0%16.0%0.0%
K9s370.6%0.0%29.4%0.0%
KJo1233.3%0.0%66.7%0.0%
KJs417.9%0.0%82.1%0.0%
KK66.4%0.0%93.6%0.0%
KQo1236.5%0.0%63.5%0.0%
KQs420.1%0.0%79.9%0.0%
KTo962.0%0.0%38.0%0.0%
KTs336.0%0.0%64.0%0.0%
Q4s321.8%0.0%78.2%0.0%
Q5s452.1%0.0%47.9%0.0%
Q6s445.6%0.0%54.4%0.0%
Q7s460.3%0.0%39.7%0.0%
Q8s466.1%0.0%33.8%0.0%
Q9o987.5%0.0%12.4%0.0%
Q9s373.0%0.0%27.0%0.0%
QJo1239.6%0.0%60.4%0.0%
QJs414.5%0.0%85.5%0.0%
QQ613.6%0.0%86.4%0.0%
QTo973.6%0.0%26.4%0.0%
QTs344.3%0.0%55.8%0.0%
T6s390.2%0.0%9.8%0.0%
T7s392.4%0.0%7.6%0.0%
T8s378.4%0.0%21.6%0.0%
T9o624.5%0.0%75.5%0.0%
T9s38.2%0.0%91.7%0.0%
TT36.2%0.0%93.8%0.0%

Methodology

Solver: TexasSolver (console); 400 iterations, accuracy target 0.2, exploitability 0.406% (closer to 0 is closer to Nash equilibrium). Solving is done locally and offline — only data outputs ship, and the AGPL component is isolated from production code (not linked, no binary distribution). Range equity is computed independently by our own deterministic engine as a cross-check.

Sitewide methodology →

FAQ

What is Button's c-bet frequency on Ts,9s,4h?

41.2% (TexasSolver output at the node where Big Blind checks); correspondingly Big Blind checks 85.1% there.

How are these numbers computed? Are they GTO?

Action frequencies come from a local offline TexasSolver run (400 iterations, exploitability 0.406% — closer to 0 is closer to equilibrium); the range equities 52.9%/47.1% are independently cross-checked by our own deterministic engine. A solve is an approximate equilibrium, not a unique answer.

Educational use; not betting advice.

Cite this page: Pailiku, “Ts,9s,4h postflop strategy (T高两色动态面, single-raised pot)”, pailiku.com/strategy/postflop/btn-vs-bb-srp-ts9s4h (2026).