Qh,6s,2c postflop strategy (Q高干面(3bet底池), 3-bet pot)
On Qh,6s,2c (Q高干面(3bet底池)), Cutoff (in position) c-bets 10.1% of the time when Big Blind (out of position) checks, while Big Blind checks 0.0%. Flop range equity: Big Blind 65.4% vs Cutoff 34.6% (our deterministic seeded Monte Carlo, 181,347 samples, 95% CI ±0.22pp). All frequencies below are TexasSolver offline outputs; exploitability 0.105%.
Range-level action frequencies
| Range / action | Check | Bet 74 (~33% pot) | Bet 169 (~75% pot) | Bet 890 (~396% pot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Blind · OOP | 0.0% | 37.1% | 62.9% | 0.0% |
| Cutoff · IP (vs check) | 89.9% | 8.2% | 1.6% | 0.4% |
Board reading
A Q-high dry board in a 3-bet pot belongs to QQ/KK/AA — almost all of which sit in BB's 3-betting range. CO's JJ-77 calling hands are in the classic squeeze: enough to show down, hating the pressure.
Cross-check from our own engine
| Range | Flop range equity | Theoretical combos | On-board combos | Board-blocker loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Blind · OOP | 65.4% ±0.22pp | 82 | 73 | 9（11.0%） |
| Cutoff · IP | 34.6% ±0.22pp | 74 | 71 | 3（4.1%） |
Method: seeded Monte Carlo (181,347 samples, 95% CI ±0.22pp); combo counts are live holdings after removing board blockers.
Solver frequency by hand class
Big Blind (OOP) frequency by class
| Hand class | Combos | Check | Bet 74 (~33% pot) | Bet 169 (~75% pot) | Bet 890 (~396% pot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2s | 3 | 0.0% | 44.8% | 55.2% | 0.0% |
| A3s | 4 | 0.0% | 28.0% | 72.0% | 0.0% |
| A4s | 4 | 0.0% | 33.5% | 66.5% | 0.0% |
| A5s | 4 | 0.0% | 33.4% | 66.6% | 0.0% |
| AA | 6 | 0.0% | 43.5% | 56.5% | 0.0% |
| AKo | 12 | 0.0% | 33.2% | 66.8% | 0.0% |
| AKs | 4 | 0.0% | 13.2% | 86.8% | 0.0% |
| AQo | 9 | 0.0% | 28.2% | 71.8% | 0.0% |
| AQs | 3 | 0.0% | 33.4% | 66.6% | 0.0% |
| JJ | 6 | 0.0% | 57.8% | 42.2% | 0.0% |
| KK | 6 | 0.0% | 26.2% | 73.8% | 0.0% |
| KQs | 3 | 0.0% | 49.1% | 50.8% | 0.0% |
| 3 | 0.0% | 48.9% | 51.1% | 0.0% | |
| TT | 6 | 0.0% | 54.9% | 45.1% | 0.0% |
Cutoff (IP, vs check) frequency by class
| Hand class | Combos | Check | Bet 74 (~33% pot) | Bet 169 (~75% pot) | Bet 890 (~396% pot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | 6 | 93.0% | 6.5% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| 88 | 6 | 95.1% | 4.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| 99 | 6 | 95.0% | 4.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| 87s | 4 | 86.5% | 10.5% | 2.7% | 0.3% |
| 98s | 4 | 87.9% | 9.5% | 2.3% | 0.3% |
| AJs | 4 | 94.1% | 4.8% | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| AKs | 4 | 96.0% | 2.9% | 0.8% | 0.4% |
| AQs | 3 | 71.5% | 27.9% | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| ATs | 4 | 97.2% | 2.2% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| JJ | 6 | 95.2% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| JTs | 4 | 97.6% | 2.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| KJs | 4 | 95.0% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 0.4% |
| KQs | 3 | 52.6% | 34.5% | 9.9% | 2.9% |
| QJs | 3 | 47.6% | 38.1% | 12.0% | 2.3% |
| T9s | 4 | 96.3% | 2.9% | 0.7% | 0.1% |
| TT | 6 | 99.1% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Methodology
Solver: TexasSolver (console); 400 iterations, accuracy target 0.2, exploitability 0.105% (closer to 0 is closer to Nash equilibrium). Solving is done locally and offline — only data outputs ship, and the AGPL component is isolated from production code (not linked, no binary distribution). Range equity is computed independently by our own deterministic engine as a cross-check.
FAQ
What is Cutoff's c-bet frequency on Qh,6s,2c?
10.1% (TexasSolver output at the node where Big Blind checks); correspondingly Big Blind checks 0.0% there.
How are these numbers computed? Are they GTO?
Action frequencies come from a local offline TexasSolver run (400 iterations, exploitability 0.105% — closer to 0 is closer to equilibrium); the range equities 65.4%/34.6% are independently cross-checked by our own deterministic engine. A solve is an approximate equilibrium, not a unique answer.
Related
Educational use; not betting advice.
Cite this page: Pailiku, “Qh,6s,2c postflop strategy (Q高干面(3bet底池), 3-bet pot)”, pailiku.com/strategy/postflop/bb3bet-vs-co-qh6s2c (2026).